These were individuals of partial Jewish ancestry. Some were treated as full-blown Jews, others as fellow Germans but with some restrictions.
Fast forward to the modern day, and lets us apply this vague terminology to another just as controversial ancestry thing: Gay’s assertion that there is a “gay gene.”
Physiology, Just Physiology Please
As a geneticist, it’s evident there would actually have to be four distinct gay genes, or two gene pairs, because there are for different types that exist:
- Gay male character
- Gay female character
- Lesbian male character
- Lesbian female character
No one has yet identified one gay gene much less four of them, and we have mapped the entire human genome; many times over.
A.I.
Not artificial intelligence – artificial insemination.
Many sperm donors are gay men. (Sperm banks prohibit gays officially, but when there’s a will there’s a way – and gays are motivated by the compelling drive to perpetuate their species and the individual’s genetic makeup.)
Consider the moral and legal issues of gay sperm donors:
- Do the mothers have a right to know the donor is gay?
- Is it discrimination if the mothers demand to know this information? Can they sue the sperm bank if they are lied to?
- If there is a gay gene, as gays insist, is being a sperm donor good, bad, a gross deception, or moot?
If a woman knows the donor is gay, will she care equally for her child; knowing that the child will not have biological children to pass her genes along to?
If there is a gay gene, and if many sperm donors are gay – how long before the human race goes extinct?
What about all those ancient societies that disappeared overnight – was that caused by the rapid, uncontrolled spread of the gay gene; like we’re seeing in the modern world?
Gay Psychology
Reproduction and the continuation of your own genetic makeup is one of the strongest drives of human beings as a species, right up there with the need for food and shelter.
What happens in the psyche when this crucial basic drive is eliminated? How does it show up elsewhere in the subconscious – in the ruthless domination of a halfway-sincere gay male? In the relentless drive for recognition by society at large via gay marriage and other initiatives?
Maybe in the ruthless drive to subvert society at large, the culture that already accepts you as an equal in every way (at least to the extent that women are accepted, which is infinitely better than disabled, especially the mentally handicapped).
Gay insistence on global social acceptance borders on sociopathic rage sometimes – especially on the internet, in gay publications and blogs – do we condone that?
Can we even study the phenomenon scientifically? No, because the mere mention of the very idea is by definition prejudice bordering on a hate crime.
Homosexuality Rule
Absent the cold, domineering, overpowering male gays – how many of their less assertive counterparts are willing victims – how many want out, but like the battered spouse syndrome, cannot escape? The state of New Jersey has just banned therapy to help kids go straight – what an abomination of desolation we’ve doomed those poor souls to.
Is it right of our liberal society, in championing gay rights, to condemn even the borderline gay to their misbegotten fate – especially the kids in New Jersey, who aren’t old enough to even understand sex; the sexual part, but not any aspect of the relationship part that comprises a marriage.
Can we at least deem homosexuality as a “lifestyle choice” to give these innocent victims a way out? Not in New Jersey.
How many of these “gay lites” would be happier as single adults, maybe even single parents, doting uncles – why can’t we as a society offer them satisfying alternatives? Why must we designate them as fodder for the aggressive gays who are activists and domineering bloggers?
By what right can we take away all alternatives from individuals who are unhappy with being homosexual?
Even the Nazis were forced to be tolerant of the assertively male gay men – gays even in that environment were driven and manipulative enough to get their way – our modern society is a soft underbelly by comparison.